Strong women and their (non-existing) supportive partners


Snapshot from the movie Julie and Julia. This scene with Meryl Streep and Stanley Tucci. Taller than most, indeed.

Last night I watched the movie Julie and Julia. The story is based on two separate true stories of two women who are passionate about cooking, and whom through cooking find their paths in life. One of the stories is a portrait of cookbook author and TV personality Julia Child’s journey from searching housewife to professional cook in the after war period.  The movie is partly based on Child’s autobiography My Life in France. The other is a contemporary story (2002-2003) of frustrated insure company employee Julia Powell who decides to cook all 524 (!) recipes from Child’s cookbook Mastering the Art of French Cooking in 365 days (!!) and simultaneously blog about it.

I found the movie by coincidence at the local library, and I had not heard about it before. I decided to borrow it because I saw that it featured Meryl Streep. I love her! Also in this movie of course. She IS the movie. And I also have to say that I love Julia Child – taller than most, high pitch voice, great fun, ambitious and hard-working. If the movie is anything like the real Julia Child, she was truly a TV genius. The movie below, which I found on Youtube indicates that this may really be the case. She’s quicker than David Letterman… The real life Julia Powell also seem to be an interesting person (an author and a butcher!).

The movie is not super-duper great, or anything. I had a few laughs, and I was real hungry watching all that cooking. But one thing struck me – hard. The whole movie I was waiting for Julie’s and Julia’s respective men to leave them. But it didn’t happen. Oh! Such a great feeling! For ones a movie in which the men whole heartedly and compassionately support their women, also when the women claim their paths, follow their passion and eventually turn out very successful. There are so many movie and real examples of the opposite. Women as victims… Men leaving their women because they take up too much space in the relationship… Women leaving their men because they don’t allow them to pursue their passions… Never Bloody Ending Story.

I want more examples of movies portraying relationships of strong women and their supportive partners. It’s good for my self-confidence. For yours also perhaps?

And what about my own relationship, you may ask. So far, so good. It’s not always easy being the workaholic wife… probably not being the husband of a workaholic either. But we’re managing. It may sound like a cliché; to communicate, stick to your entrepreneurial goals and set goals together seem key.

But back to the movies now. Gimme gimme!


The real Julia Child on David Letterman show, 1987. I like this woman! :)

xo,

Evelina

Today is Boobquake day!

The other day I found something really interesting on Aftonbladet, Boobquake day! The Boobquake day experiment is carried through under the motto: “Help fight supernatural thinking and the oppression of women, just by dressing immodestly!”

The background of the event is a quote by Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi a religious leader in Iran: ”Many women who do not dress modestly … lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which (consequently) increases earthquakes,”

This is quite some statement! I know that humanity is affecting the climate, but causing the tectonic plates to move only through the choice of clothing style, that’s heavy stuff. The woman behind Boobquake, Jen McCreight, is encouraging people to participate through her blog and Facebook event-page.

“On Monday, April 26th, I will wear the most cleavage-showing shirt I own. Yes, the one usually reserved for a night on the town. I encourage other female skeptics to join me and embrace the supposed supernatural power of their breasts. Or short shorts, if that’s your preferred form of immodesty. With the power of our scandalous bodies combined, we should surely produce an earthquake. If not, I’m sure Sedighi can come up with a rational explanation for why the ground didn’t rumble. And if we really get through to him, maybe it’ll be one involving plate tectonics.”

I like this initiative, it’s innovative and fun. It’s a simple idea, it’s easy to participate and it’s grounded in a fundamental discussion about women’s rights to their own bodies. And it makes you think. Or to be more exact, it makes me think. Heck… even as I’m about to click the publish button I’m thinking… Is the picture of my boobs good enough? Shouldn’t I be showing more cleavage? Should I be wearing another bra? What will other people think when I write about my boob thoughts? But hang on a minute! This exactly what Boobquake is all about! I should be proud of who I am, my thoughts and my body!

My cleavage (or non-existing) is perfect the way it is! And to all my sisters (and brothers) out there – you are also perfect the way you are. Be proud of who you are and what you can accomplish in this world!

I’m in! Bring on the Boobquake! And keep an eye on the seismographs…

[Updated, April 28th: The results from Boobquake are in! Did we manage to cause some tectonic movement!? Read more on Jen McCreight's blog.]

Saudi girls Rock

Wow! This is inspiring. An all girl Rockband from Saudi Arabia.

And here is a link to a swedish blog pointing out all the embarrassing mistakes the big swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter made ripping the story and doing a terribly bad translation job.

I wish this story is true because it proves that change is possible even in the most conservative of places. 

The award almost fell over

Something else I reflected on, hopefully it doesn’t symbolize how important the award for Gründerin des Jahres really is… the trophy for the winner was so small and light weighted that it almost fell over when somebody happened to touch the table where it was standing… Trophies should be big and important… it should symbolise how the award winner should feel. Pretty, humble and surprisingly small is the wrong way to go.

Immature gender equality discussion

Friday this week I attended the award ceremony for Gründerin des Jahres 2008 here in Styria, Austria. Gründerin des Jahres is an award for women who recently founded a successful company. Renate Willfort, the CEO of Dresscode21, the company where I work was nominated, hence my attendance.

During the ceremony some local politicians where interviewed about why this award is so important. They all repeated the mouldy mantra of how different men and women are and how important it is to have companies owned and run by women because they bring something different into business, something men aren’t capable of doing/thinking/bringing in. This is of course old stuff, which I hear a lot more often in Austria than in Sweden. (Even though the regional meeting for entrepreneurial women in Växjö, Sweden last Monday was embarrassingly close. Too much pink and self-pity is never particularly attractive or encouraging.)

No, what really made me react was something one of the local politicians said. She firmly believed that women have less pay because women have bad self-confidence. Saying this in front of any group of people is embarrassing. But saying this in front of a group of a hard working self-employed women waiting to accept an award is simply humiliating. I find it hard to believe that every one of the women in the room had worse self-confidence then the men sitting next to them. Saying this, the politician indirectly also implied that men have better pay because they all swell with self-confidence. I know this is not true.

The solution the politician offered for raising women’s salaries was an encouragement that we should quit the lowest paid ones and get other occupations. She meant we should stop being nurses, kindergarten teachers and taking care of elderly people. I don’t think she knew what she was saying. Will that ever happen? Or perhaps she’s encouraging revolution. When no women do this work – men has to do it. Interesting!

My point is: People are different. My experience is that two women, often turn out to be more different than a man and a women. There are so many layers of a person; ethnicity, class, experiences, memories, political and sexual preferences, movie taste etc. Stopping at the physical appearance and hormone level is plainly immature. What reproduces the pattern of men and women having different levels of pay is a glitch in the system. It’s a pattern from the 20th century, which we accept over and over again. It’s built on our belief that women and men are very different and therefore we should have different pay. This is not an individual problem, it’s a system problem, which is easy to solve by staying updated with reality and educated within gender equality issues. Having had up to 30 employees and lots of freelancers I know how easy it is to fall into patterns and give guys better pay then gals. Time to break the pattern! Make strategies and make them happen.